International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Optimization of Kabuli chickpea dehulling process

By: Khosro Mohammadi Ghermezgoli, Hamid Reza Ghassemzadeh, Mohammad Moghaddam

Key Words: Chickpea, Dehulling efficiency, Optimization, Response surface methodology

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 10(2), 115-125, February 2017.

Abstract

Dehulling of chickpea is an important process for preparing value-added products. To improve the dehulling characteristics, a tangential abrasive dehulling device (TADD) was used to investigate the effect of the rotational speed and grit size of abrasive disk, microwave exposure and retention time on the dehulling behavior of chickpea grain. Response surface methodology (RSM) based on a four-factor, five-level and central composite design was employed to study the effect of the independent variables and optimize processing conditions. In order to obtain higher dehulling efficiency accompanying with decreasing dehulling loss optimization process was done. The best condition of dehulling was obtained with rotational speed of 790.44rpm, microwave exposure time of 98s, retention time of 120s and grit size of 50 so that the dehulling efficiency of 86.02% and dehulling loss of 2.6% were recorded.

| Views 80 |

Optimization of Kabuli chickpea dehulling process

Akinoso R, Aboaba S, Olajide W. 2011. Optimization of roasting temperature and time during oil extraction from orange (Citrus sinensis) seeds: A response surface methodology approach. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 11, 5300-5317.

Barnwal P, Singh KK, Mridula D, Kumar R, Rehal J. 2010. Effect of moisture content and residence time on dehulling of flaxseed. Journal of Food Science and Technology 47, 662-667.

Baş D, Boyacı İH. 2007. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering 78, 836-845.

Chakraborty SK, Kumbhar B, Sarkar B. 2007. Process parameter optimization for instant pigeonpea dhal using response surface methodology. Journal of food engineering 81, 171-178.

Chavan JK, Kadam SS, Salunkhe DK, Beuchat LR. 1987. Biochemistry and technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 25, 107-158.

Coşkuner Y, Karababa E. 2004. Leblebi: a roasted chickpea product as a traditional Turkish snack food. Food Reviews International 20, 257-274.

De Figueiredo AK, Rodríguez LM, Lindström LI, Riccobene IC, Nolasco SM. 2013. Performance analysis of a dehulling system for safflower grains. Industrial Crops and Products 43, 311-317.

Erskine W, Williams PC, Nakkoul H. 1991. Splitting and dehulling lentil (Lens culinaris): effects of seed size and different pretreatments. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 77-84.

George E, Rentsen B, Tabil LG, Meda V. 2014. Optimization of wheat debranning using laboratory equipment for ethanol production. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 7, 54-66.

Goyal R, Vishwakarma R, Wanjari O. 2008. Optimisation of the pigeon pea dehulling process. Biosystems Engineering 99, 56-61.

Goyal R, Vishwakarma R, Wanjari O. 2009. Optimization of process parameters and mathematical modelling for dehulling of pigeonpea. International journal of food science & technology 44, 36-41.

Jerish Joyner J, Yadav BK. 2015. Optimization of continuous hydrothermal treatment for improving the dehulling of black gram (Vigna mungo L). Journal of Food Science and Technology 52, 7817-7827.

Joyner JJ, Yadav BK. 2015. Microwave assisted dehulling of black gram (Vigna mungo L). Journal of Food Science and Technology 52, 2003-2012.

Jukanti A, Gaur P, Gowda C, Chibbar R. 2012. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition 108, S11-S26.

Kurien P. 1987. Postharvest technology of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB, eds. The chickpea; C.A.B. International.

Mangaraj S, Singh KP. 2011. Milling study of multiple pulses using CIAE dhal mill for optimal responses. Journal of Food Processing and Technology 2, 110.

Mathukia P, Sangani V, Mathukia R. 2014. Optimization of Roller Speed and Feed Rate of Mini Dhal Mill for Hulling Efficiency of Pigeonpea. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal 2, 176-181.

Miao M, Zhang T, Jiang B. 2009. Characterisations of kabuli and desi chickpea starches cultivated in China. Food Chemistry 113, 1025-1032.

Montgomery DC. 2008. Design and analysis of experiments: John Wiley & Sons.

Mrad R, Assy P, Maroun RG, Louka N. 2015. Multiple optimization of polyphenols content, texture and color of roasted chickpea pre-treated by IVDV using response surface methodology. LWT – Food Science and Technology 62, 532-540.

Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. 2009. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments: John Wiley & Sons.

Oomah B, Reichert R, Youngs C. 1981. A novel, multi-sample, tangential abrasive dehulling device (TADD). Cereal Chem 58, 392-395.

Singh K. 1997. Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research 53, 161-170.

Sokhansanj S, Patil RT. 2003. Dehulling and splitting pulses. In: Chakraverty A, Mujumdar AS, Ramaswamy HS, eds. Handbook of postharvest technology: cereals, fruits, vegetables, tea, and spices; CRC Press, p. 397-426.

Wang N. 2005. Optimization of a Laboratory Dehulling Process for Lentil (Lens culinaris). Cereal Chemistry 82, 671-676.

Khosro Mohammadi Ghermezgoli, Hamid Reza Ghassemzadeh, Mohammad Moghaddam.
Optimization of Kabuli chickpea dehulling process.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 10(2), 115-125, February 2017.
http://www.innspub.net/jbes/optimization-of-kabuli-chickpea-dehulling-process/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update