International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Effect of humic acid on some morphological traits of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in Karaj region

By: Samaneh Ahmadi, Abdollah Hatamzadeh, Mohammad Hasan Biglueii, Amir Sahraroo

Key Words: Fertilizer, Morphological traits, Leguminous, Seed yield

J. Bio. Env. Sci. 11(1), 287-295, July 2017.

Certification: jbes 2017 0032


Humic acid is one of the most organic substances that has been used today due to its advantages, such as improving drainage and soil air, causing the development of microorganisms, increasing plant yield and growth, and also reducing the consumption of other fertilizers. In order to evaluate humic acid on some morphological traits of guar plant, a randomized complete block design experiment with three replications was conducted in 2015 and 2016. Fertilization treatments included four levels of humic acid (0,1,3 and 6 liters per Hectare). The evaluated traits was including the emergence index, emergence percentage, leaf area index, number of leaves, lateral shoots, seeds per pod, pods per plant, seed yield, weight of 100 seeds, stem diameter in two steps and plant height in three steps. Analysis of variance showed that humic acid had a significant effect on evaluated traits except number of lateral shoots and weight of 100 seeds. Based on the results, the highest leaf area index, number of leaves, stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, emergence index, emergence percentage and seed yield were related to the fertilization treatment of 6 liters per hectare, however, no significant difference was observed with fertilization treatment of 3 liters per hectare. Also, the results showed that fertilization reduced the plant height at different steps.

| Views 12 |

Effect of humic acid on some morphological traits of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in Karaj region

Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, El-Greadly NHM, Helmy YI, Singer SM. 2007. Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. J. Appl. Sci. Res 3, 169-174.

Albayrak S, Camas N. 2005. Effect of different levels and application times of humic acid on root &leaf yield and yield component of forage Turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Agronomy Journal 42, 130-133.

Alexander WL, Bucks DA, Backhaus RA. 1988. Irrigation water management for guar seed production., Agronomy Journal 80, 447-453.

Armin M, Moslehi J. 2012. Response of yield and yield components of chickpea to time and amount of humic acid. Modern Science of Sustainable Agriculture 4, 1-9. (In Persian).

Astaraei AR, Ivani R. 2008. Effect of organic sources as foliar spray and root madia on nutrition in cowpea plant. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci 3(3), 352-356. (In Persian).

Boutraa T, Sanders FE. 2001. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two culti-vars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agron-omy and Crop Science 187, 251-257.

Bronick EJ, Lai R. 2005. Soil structure and management : A review. Geoderma 124, 3-22.

Cooper R J, Liu C, Fisher DS. 1988. Influence of humic substances on rooting and nutrient content of creeping bent grass. Crop Sci 38(6), 1639-1644.

Daneshvar Hakimi Meybodi N, Kafi M, Nikbakht A, Rejali F. 2011. Effect of humic acid on some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Speedy Green Grass. Journal of Iranian Horticultural Science 42 (4), 403-412. (In Persian).

Dursun A, Guvenc I, Turan M. 2002. Effects of different levels of humic acid on seedling growth and macro and micronutrient contents of tomato and eggplant. Acta Agrobotanica 56, 1-88.

Goldani M, Rezvani Moghaddam P. 2007. The effects of different irrigation regimes and planting date on phenology and growth indices of three chickpea cultivars in Mashhad. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 14(1), 63-74. (In Persian).

Koo ES. 2006. Humic acid or fulvic acid: which organic acid accelerates the germination of the green mung beans? California State Science Fair 1617.

Marina N, Jerez IT, He SA, Zhao JI, Dixon PX, May GD. 2007. Analysis of cDNA libraries from developing seeds of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub). BMC Plant Biology 7, 62 doi:10.1186/471-2229-/7/62.

Mir Hajian. 2012. What is humic acid? Journal of Analytical News, Education and Agricultural Engineering 7-16, 33. (In Persian).

Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS. 2011. Guar gum: Processing, properties and food applications—A Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. Doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x.

Murwan KS, Abdalla AH. 2008. Yield and yield components of Forty five Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) Genotype Grown in Sudan. Nile Basin Research Journal 11(4), 48.

Najafi FP, Rezvani Moghadam MH, Rashid-Mohasel. 2001. Effect of different irrigation and concentration regimes on the quantity and quality of Isabgol (Plantago ovata). Thesis master of agriculture. Mashhad Ferdowsi University. (In Persian).

Narayan R. 2012. From Food to Fracking: Guar Gum and International Regulation”. RegBlog. University of Pennsylvania Law School. Retrieved 15 August 2012.

Nardi S, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vianello A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem 34, 1527-1536.

Norman Q, Stephen L, Clive A, Rola A. 2003. Effects of humic acids derived from cattle, food and paper waste vermicomposts on growth of greenhouse plants. Pedobiol 47, 741-744.

Padem H, Ocal A, Alan R. 1999. Effect of humic acid added foliar fertilizer on quality and nutrient content of eggplant and pepper seedlings. ISHS Acta Hort 491.

Pandey RK, Herera WAT, Pendleton JW. 1984. Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient. I: Yield components. Agronomy Journal 76, 549- 553.

Rubio V, Bustos R, Irigoyen ML, Cardona-Lopez X, Rojas-Triana M, Paz-Ares J. 2009. Plant hormones and nutrient signaling. Plant Mol. Biol 69(4), 361-73.

Sabzevari S, Khazaie HR, Kafi M. 2009. Effect of humic acid on root and shoot growth of two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L). Journal of Water and Soil Vol. 23, No. 2, Summer 2009, p.87-94. (In Persian).Sharifi Ashuraabadi A. 1998. Investigation of soil fertility in ecosystems. Thesis of agriculture phD, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.

Shekari F, Baljani R, Saba J, Afsahi K, Shekari F. 2010. Effect of Seed Pre-priming with Salicylic Acid on growth characteristics of Borago officinalis. Journal of modern science of agriculture 18, 47-53.

Shekari F. 2001. Review of drought tolerant traits on bean. research reports of agricultural Physiology and Biotechnology research institute, Zanjan University.

Singer MJ, Bissonnais LY. 1998. Importance of surface sealing in the rosion of some soils from a Mediterranean climate. Geomorphology 24, 79-85.

Turkmen N, Dursan A, Turan M, Erdinc C. 2004. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under salin soil conditions. Acta Agric. Scandinavica, Section B-Soil and Plant Sci 54(3), 168-174.

Whistler RL, Hymowitz T. 1979. Guar: agronomy, production, industrial use and nutrition. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette.

Yadav RS. 1998. Effects of Weed Removal in Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetmgonoloba) under Different Rainfall Situations in an Arid Region. Agricultural Research Station, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Mandor Jodhpur 342, 304.

Samaneh Ahmadi, Abdollah Hatamzadeh, Mohammad Hasan Biglueii, Amir Sahraroo.
Effect of humic acid on some morphological traits of Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) in Karaj region.
J. Bio. Env. Sci. 11(1), 287-295, July 2017.
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update