International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Performance evaluation of some productive tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrids

By: Md. Omar Kayess, Md. Jalil Uddin, Md. Hasanuzzaman, Md. Imanur Rahman, Md. Rakibul Alam

Key Words: Tomato, Hybrids, Agronomic traits, Performance

Int. J. Biosci. 10(1), 279-284, January 2017.



Performance of ten tomato hybrids were tested in randomized complete block design with three replications at the experimental field under the department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur from October 2015 to April 2016. Different agronomical traits were investigated. Analyses of variance for all the traits were showed significant differences among the hybrids. From the research work it was found that, significant difference was high in case of plant height, canopy width and number of marketable fruits per plant. Single fruit weight, days to 1st flowering, fruit diameter and shelf life were showed moderate significant difference among the hybrids. Hybrid-6 was the highest yielding (2003.15 g plant-1) hybrid possessed highest single fruit weight (45.81g) with medium plant height (84.40 cm) and second highest fruit diameter (59.85 mm) producer. It also requires minimum days to 50% flowering (23.20) with medium canopy width (46.20 cm) and average number of marketable fruits plant-1 (41.40) in the same way medium shelf life (12.00 days) and fruit length (8.87 mm) too. The second highest yielding hybrid was Hybrid-10 which showed minimum thousand seed weight but produced lower fruit length (6.82 cm), fruit diameter (14.16 mm) and single fruit weight (29.78 g). The third highest yielding hybrid was Hybrid-4 (1913.32 g plant-1) and minimum thousand seed weight but revealed worsen performance to the other traits. So, it was recommended for further popularization of Hybrid-6 hybrid in Bangladesh especially in northern parts.

| Views 22 |

Performance evaluation of some productive tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrids

Ahmed KU. 1976. Phul Phal and Shak Sabjee, 3rd Edn. Alhaj Kaniisuddin Ahmed, Bungalow No. 2, Farmgate, Dhaka-15, Bangladesh 12-13.

BARC (Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council). 2005. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka, Bangladesh 61-78.

BBS. 2012. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Planning Division, Ministry of Planning, Govt. of The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka 108.

Bose TK, Som, MG. 1990. Vegetables Crops in India. Naya Prokash. Calcutta, India 249.

Gerster H. 1997. The potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Am. College Nutr 16, 109-126.

Hanson P, Chen JT, Cou CG, Morris R, Opena R. 2001. “Tomato production.” Asian Vegetable Research Development Center 3, 8-9.

Hossain MM. 2003. Comparative morpho-physiological studies of some exotic and local genotypes of tomato. M.S. Thesis, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural. University, Mymensingh 26-28.

Kabir MSA. 2004. Morpho-physiological evaluation of elite genotypes of tomato in early summer season. M.S. Thesis, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 31-39.

Kamran M, Anwar SA, Khan SA. 2011. Evaluation of tomato genotypes against Meloidogyne incognita infection. Pak. J. Phytopathol 23(1), 31-34.

Karim MR. 2005. Study of growth and yield performance of late transplanted summer tomato genotypes. M.S. Thesis, Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 34.

Kaushik SK, Tomar DS, Dixit AK. 2011. Genetics of fruit yield and it’s contributing characters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom). J. Agric. Biotechnol. Sustainable Develop 3(10), 209-213.

http://dx.doi. org/10.5897/jabsd11.027.

Kulkarni GP. 1999. Heterosis, combining ability and reaction to tomato leaf curl virus in tomato. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).

Lester GE. 2006. Environmental regulation of human health nutrients (ascorbic acid, β-carotene and folic acid) in fruits and vegetables. Horticultural Science 41(1), 59-64.

Mayeaux M, Xu Z, King JM, Prinyawiwatkul W. 2006. Effects of cooking conditions on the lycopene content in Tomatoes. J. Food Sci 71, 461-464.

Moraru C, Logendra L, Lee TCH, Janes. 2004. Characteristics of 10 processing tomato cultivars grown hydroponically for the NASA Advances Life (ALS) Support Program. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 17(2), 141-154.

Patil VS. 2003. Studies on double crosses involving potential tomato hybrids. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).

Phookan DB, Ta1ukdar P, Shadeque A, Chakravarty BK. 1998. Genetic variability in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes during summer season under plastic house condition. Indian journal of Agricultural Science 68, 304-306.

Rao AV, Agarwal S. 1999. Role of lycopene as antioxidant carotenoids in the prevention of chronic diseases: a review. Nutr. Res 19, 305-323.

Regassa MD, Mohammed A, Bantte K. 2012. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes for yield and yield components. The Asian J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol 6, 45-49.

Rukhsar AD, Jag PS, Ambreen N, Chopra S. 2012. Germplasm evaluation for yield and fruit quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(46), 6143-6149.

Scalff M, Westphall MS, Lloyd MS. 2000. Charge Reduction Electrospray Mass Spectrometry: Article in Analytical Chemistry 72(1), 52-60.

Sekhar L, Prakash BG, Salimath PM, Sieve O, Patil AA. 2008. Performance of productive single cross hybrids in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(4), 877-878.

Siddiqui S, Brackmann A, Streif J, Bangerth F. 1996. Controlled atmosphere storage of apples: cell wall composition and fruit softening. J Hortic Sci    71, 613-620.

Siddiqui S, Gupta OP, Pandy, VE. 1986. Assessment of quality of tomato Varieties at various stages of fruit maturity. Progressive Horticulture 18(1-2), 97-100.

Singh AK, Bhalla SK, Verma S. 2002. A note on the variability in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 98-100.

Singh UN, Saha A, Panda AK. 1997. Genetic variability and correlation studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Environmental Ecology 15, 177-181.

Sonone AH, Patil SB, More DC. 1986. Variability and heritability in inter-varietal crosses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Current Research Report, Mohatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, India 2, 125-127.

Srivastava JP, Singh H, Shrivastava BP, Verma HRS. 1998. Heterosis in relation to combining ability in tomato. Veg. Sci 25, 43-47.

Takeoka GR, Dao L, Flessa S, Gillespie DM, Jewell WT, Huebner B. 2001. Processing effects on lycopene content and antioxidant activity of tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem 49, 3713-3717.

Thompson HC, Kelly WC. 1983. Vegetable crops, 5th edition. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi 611.

UNDP, FAO. 1988. Land report appraisal of Bangladesh for Agricultural Development report on 2 Agro-ecological regions of Bangladesh. United Nations Development Program and Food and Agriculture Organization 212-221.

Wilcox JK, Catignani GL, Lazarus C. 2003. Tomatoes and cardiovascular health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr 43(1), 1-18.

Yogananda BR. 1997. Studies on heterosis in tomato. Mysore J. Agric. Sci 12, 676.

Md. Omar Kayess, Md. Jalil Uddin, Md. Hasanuzzaman, Md. Imanur Rahman, Md. Rakibul Alam. 2017. Performance evaluation of some productive tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) hybrids. Int. J. Biosci. 10(1), 279-284.
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update