International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Optimization of Humic acid application rate by evaluating the response of mung been (Vigna radiata) yield, growth components and soil properties in western region of Saudi Arabia

By: Tasneem Akhtar, Saleh M. Ismail, Fathy S. Al-Nakhlawy

Key Words: Humic acid, Optimum rate, Macronutrients, Growth component

Int. J. Biosci. 11(1), 240-248, July 2017.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/11.1.240-248

Certification: ijb 2017 0033

Abstract

Discriminate use of fertilizers gradually damaging biological and physical properties of soil as well as bioavailability of nutrients and organic matter resulting results in low crop yield. So there is needed to equilibrate the application of inorganic fertilizer with organic fertilizers especially in arid region of Saudi Arabia to sustain and conserve soil resources for long term and better yield results. A field experiment was carried out at the Agriculture Research Station of King Abdulaziz University to investigate the effect of different rates of humic acid application along with inorganic fertilizers on growth components of mung bean (Vigna radiata) crop and soil properties. The design of the experiment was a completely randomized design with four replications. Three treatments of humic acid (HA 20, 20kg/ha; HA 40, 40kg/ha and HA 60, 60kg/ha) along with control (HA 0) was applied. Results indicates that humic acid application caused significant improvement in the growth parameters of mung bean crop at all levels and (HA 40) proved to be optimum application rate for growth improvement. Regarding soil parameters, a significant decrease in pH was observed at (HA 40), while significant decrease in EC was observed at (HA 40). For soil fertility parameters, HA 40 (40 kg/ha) and HA 60 (60 kg/ha) significantly increase the availability of primary macronutrients (N, P and K) in the soil. The results suggested that application of humic acid at optimum rate HA 40; 40 kg/ha) improves plant and soil attributes to play an important role in sustainable agriculture.

| Views 14 |

Optimization of Humic acid application rate by evaluating the response of mung been (Vigna radiata) yield, growth components and soil properties in western region of Saudi Arabia

Akinichi S, bueyuekkeskin  T, Eroglu  A, Erdogan  BE.  2009. The effect of humic acid on nutrient composition in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) roots. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 1(1), 81.

Bakry  BA, Elewa  TA,  El-Kramany  MF,  Wali  AM.  2013. Effect of humic and ascorbic acids foliar application on yield and yield components of two wheat cultivars grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(6), 1125-1133.

http://dx.doi.org/20133204041.

Buyukkeskin  T,  Akinci  S.  2011. The effects of humic acid on above-ground parts of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) seedlings under Al (3+) toxicity.

Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 20(3), 539-548.

https://www.researchgate.net/40832868

Canellas  LP, Olivares  FL.  2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 1(1), 3.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3

Daur  I, Bakhashwain  AA.  2013. Effect of humic acid on growth and quality of maize fodder production. Pakistan Journal of botany45, 21-25. http://dx.doi.org/org/10.12692/ijb/5.2.99-105

Du  H, Xue  S, Sun  Z.  2007. Effects of different application rates of humic acid compound fertilizer on leave nutrient accumulation and physiological mechanism of grape. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 15, 49–51.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1109106

El-Bassiony  AM, Fawzy  ZF, Abd  El-Baky  MMH, Mahmoud AR.  2010.  Response  of  Snap  Bean  Plants  to  Mineral Fertilizers  and  Humic  Acid  Application.  Research Journal of Agriculture and Biomass Sciences 6, 169-175.

http://dx.doi.org/20103157609

El-Bassiouny  HS, Bakry  M, Attia  BA,  Allah  MMA.  2014. Physiological role of humic acid and nicotinamide on improving plant growth, yield, and mineral nutrient of wheat (Triticum durum) grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Agricultural Sciences, 2014.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.58072

El-Hassanin  AS, Samak  MR, Moustafa  NS, Khalifa  AM, Inas  MI.  2016. Effect of Foliar Application with Humic Acid Substances under Nitrogen Fertilization Levels on Quality and Yields of Sugar Beet Plant. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science, 5(11), 668-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.511.078

Gao  TG, Jiang  F, Yang  JS, Li  BZ, Yuan  HL.

  1. Biodegradation of Leonardite by an alkali-producing bacterial community and characterization of the degraded products. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2581–2590.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3669-5.

Hafez  MM, Shafeek  MR, Mahmoud  AR, Ali  AH.  2015. Beneficial Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Humic acid on Growth, Yield and Nutritive Values of Spinach (Spinacia olivera L.). Sciences, 5(02), 597-603.

Han  ZH. 2011. Apple Cultivation with Drawf  Rootstock and High Density- theory and Pratice. Science Press, Beijing.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010029452011000500006

Khan  A,  Khan  MZ,  Hussain  F,  Akhtar  ME,  Gurmani  AR, Khan  S.  2012.  Effect  of  humic  acid  on  the  growth,  yield, nutrient  composition,  photosynthetic  pigment  and  total  sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum  L.). Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan, 35, 206-211.

Kumar  R, Singh  MP, Kumar  S.  2012. Effect of salinity on germination, growth, yield and yield attributes of wheat. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 1, 19-23.

Mac Carthy  P, Clapp  CE, Malcom  RL, Bloom  PR.  2001. Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, W.I.

http://dx.doi.org/19911950504

Mohajerani  S, Fazel,  MA, Madani  H, Lak  S, Modhej  A.  2016. Effect of the foliar application of humic acid on red bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 4(5), 519-524.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18006

Moraditochaee M. 2012. Investigation energy indices of corn production in north of Iran. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 7(5), 376-379.

Peng   Z, Men  M, Xue  S, Xue  B, Bi  S.  2007. Effects of humic acid compound fertilizers on the nitrogen utilization and the following rape. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 15, 51–53.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167

Saruhan  V, Kusvuran  A, Babat  S.  2011. The effect of different humic acid fertilization on yield and yield components performances of common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Science Research Essays 6, 663-669.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.1153

Selim  EM, El-Neklawy  AS, El-Ashry  SM.  2010. Beneficial effects of humic substances on soil fertility to fertigated potato grown on sandy soil. Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International, 1(4), 255-262.

Seydabadi  A, Armin  M.  2014. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to herbicide tank-mixing and humic acid. International Journal of Biosciences 4(12), 339-345.

Shafeek  MR, Helmy  Y, Nadia  YI, Omer  M, Fatma  AR.  2013. Effect of foliar fertilizer with nutritional compound and humic acid on growth and yield of broad bean plants under sandy soil conditions. Journal of Applied Science Research 9, 3674-3680.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(5).519.524

Steel  RGD, Torrie  JH, Dicky  DA.  1997. Principles and procedures of statistics- A  biometrical  approach.  3rd Ed. Mc Graw-Hill, New York, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7101(81)90057-X

Ulukan  H.  2008. Effect of soil applied humic acid at different sowing times on some yield components in wheat (Triticum spp.) hybrids. International Journal of Botany 4(2), 164-175.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijb

Vijayakumar R, Arokiaraj  A, Martin  DP.  2011. Micronutrients and their relationship with soil properties of natural disaster proned coastal soils. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences 1(1), 8-12.

Xi J, He  M, Lin  C.  2010. Adsorption of antimony (V) on kaolinite as a function of pH, ionic strength and humic acid. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60(4), 715-722.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0209-z

Yildirim  E.  2007. Foliar  and  soil  fertilization  of  humic  acid affect  productivity  and  quality  of  tomato.  Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section  B-Soil  and  Plant  Science 57,  182-186.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710600813107

Tasneem Akhtar, Saleh M. Ismail, Fathy S. Al-Nakhlawy.
Optimization of Humic acid application rate by evaluating the response of mung been (Vigna radiata) yield, growth components and soil properties in western region of Saudi Arabia.
Int. J. Biosci. 11(1), 240-248, July 2017.
http://www.innspub.net/ijb/optimization-humic-acid-application-rate-evaluating-response-mung-vigna-radiata-yield-growth-components-soil-properties-western-region-saudi-arabia/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
brand
innspub logo
english language editing
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Publish Your Article
  • CALL FOR PAPERS
    CALL FOR PAPERS
    Submit Your Article
INNSPUB on FB
Email Update