International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Genetic diversity of maize landraces from Tanzania as compared with commercial improved varieties and elite lines through morphological characterization

By: Mujuni Sospeter Kabululu, Tileye Feyissa, Patrick Alois Ndakidemi

Key Words: Genetic diversity, Maize, Landraces, Morphological characterization, Improved varieties

Int. J. Biosci. 10(3), 309-322, March 2017.



Maize production challenges require well-known genetic diversity to ensure effective improvement. The study aimed at conducting morphological evaluation on 50 maize landraces from Tanzania compared with 7 commercial varieties and 11 elite lines from CIMMYT, Kenya. The experiments were conducted in randomized complete block design at three locations in Arusha region, Tanzania. Data were collected on 19 quantitative and 12 qualitative traits that were subjected to analysis of variance, descriptive and multivariate statistics. Significant variations (p<0.05) were observed for all traits while higher contribution for accessions variability were found with yield, a thousand kernel weight, flowering traits, kernel, ear and vegetative plant characteristics. Commercial varieties were characterized by significant yield (107.4g per plant) and yield related parameters of (a thousand seed weight, number of rows per ear, ear diameter, ear length) also early days to tasseling and silking of 67.7 and 73 respectively. CIMMYT elite lines were characterized by significant low plant and ear height of 138.9cm and 50.6cm respectively as well as flint kernel type. Landraces were more diverse in every trait evaluated with significant long anthesis-silking interval of 7.5 days and large ear height of 95.9cm. Some landraces (eg TZA 2793 and TZA 5170) expressed significant traits that would be tapped for further crop improvement. Other landraces clustered themselves irregularly in terms of their collection sites within their major group due to selection and exchange of seeds. Thus, farmers as custodians of landraces are supposed to be involved in a systematic selection and breeding.

| Views 21 |

Genetic diversity of maize landraces from Tanzania as compared with commercial improved varieties and elite lines through morphological characterization

Aci MM, Revilla P, Morsli A, Djemel A, Belalia N, Kadri Y, Khelifi-Saloui M, Ordás B, Khelifi L. 2013. Genetic diversity in Algerian maize (Zea mays L) landraces using SSR markers. Maydica 58, 304-310.

Asare S, Tetteh AY, Twumasi P, Adade KB, Akromah RA. 2016. Genetic diversity in lowland, midaltitude and highland African maize landraces by morphological trait. evaluation. African Journal of Plant Science 10(11), 246-257.

Bucheyeki TL. 2012. Characterization and genetic analysis of maize germplasm for resistance to northern corn leaf blight disease in Tanzania. Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg. Accessed on 02 February 2017 at 10413/8730.

Cömertpay G, Baloch FS, Kilian B, Ahmet CÜ, Hakan Ö. 2012. Diversity assessment of Turkish maize landraces based on fluorescent labelled SSR markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 30, 261-274.

Drinic SM, Andjelkovic V, Micic DI. 2012. Genetic diversity of maize landraces as sources of favorable traits, the molecular basis of plant genetic diversity. Prof. Mahmut Caliskan (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0157-4, InTech.

Hartings H, Berardo N, Mazzinelli GF, Valoti P, Verderio A, Motto M. 2008. Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) Italian landraces by morphological traits and AFLP profiling. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117, 831-842.

Ignjatovic-Micic D, Risitc D, Babic V, Andelkovic V, Markovic K, Vancetovic J. 2013. Genetic assessment of maize landraces from former Yugoslavia. Genetika, 45(2), 405-417.

Kabululu MS, Ndunguru J, Ndakidemi P, Feyissa T. 2017. Genetic diversity of maize accessions for Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease resistance. Indian Journal of Agricultural. Research 51(1), 17-24.

Katinila N, Verkuijl H, Mwangi W, Anandajayasekeram P, Moshi AJ. 1998. Adoption of maize production technologies in southern Tanzania. Mexico, D.F.: International maize and wheat improvement center (CIMMYT), the United Republic of Tanzania, and the Southern Africa Centre for Cooperation in Agricultural Research (SACCAR).

Kiruwa FH, Feyissa T, Ndakidemi PA. 2016. Insights of maize lethal necrotic disease: A major constraint to maize production in East Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 10(9), 271-279.

Lafitte HR, Edmeades GO, Taba S. 1997. Adaptive strategies identified among tropical maize landraces for nitrogen-limited environments. Field Crops Research 49, 187-204.

Louette D, Smale M. 2000. Farmers’ seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica 113, 25-41.

Molin D, Coelho CJ, Máximo DS, Ferreira FS, Gardingo JR, Matiello RR. 2013. Genetic diversity in the germplasm of tropical maize landraces determined using molecular markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 12(1), 99-114.

Moshi AJ, Mduruma ZO, Lyimo NG, Marandu WF, Akonnay HB. 1990. Maize breeding for target environments in Tanzania. In A.J. Moshi and J.K. Ransom (Eds.), Maize Research in Tanzania: Proceedings of the First Tanzania National Maize Research Workshop. Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania: TARO pp. 11-16.

N’Da HA, Akanvou L, Bi AIZ, Kouakou CK. 2015. Phenotypic diversity of farmer’s traditional maize (Zea mays L) varieties in Cote d’Ivoire. Maydica 60, 1-9.

Ngwediagi P, Maeda E, Kimomwe H, Kamara R, Massawe S, Akonaay HB, Mapunda LND. 2009. Tanzania report on the state of plant Genetic resources for food and Agriculture. Accessed on 02 February 2017 at:

Ntundu WH, Shillah SA, Marandu WYF, Christiansen JL. 2006. Morphological diversity of bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] landraces in Tanzania. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53, 367-378.

Obeng-Antwi K, Craufurd PQ, Menkir A, Ellis RH, Sallah PYK. 2012. Phenotypic diversity in maize landraces in Ghana. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, 2(5), 39-70.

Olaoye G. 2009. Evaluation of new generations of maize streak virus (MSV) resistant varieties for grain yield, agronomic potential and adaptation to a southern guinea savanna ecology of Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Agriculture Food, Environment and Extension, 8(2), 104-109.

Otunge D, Muchiri N, Wachoro G, Kullaya A. 2010. Mitigating the impact of drought in Tanzania: the WEMA intervention. Policy brief: African agricultural technology foundation (AATF) and the Tanzania commission for science and technology (COSTECH).

Prasanna BM. 2010. Phenotypic and molecular diversity of maize landraces: characterization and utilization. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 70(4), 315-327.

Prasanna BM. 2012. Diversity in global maize germplasm: Characterization and utilization. Journal of Biological Science 37, 843-855.

Pressoir G, Berthaud J. 2004. Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico. Heredity 92, 88-94.

Rahman H, Ali S, Shah SMA, Shah SS, Rahman N, Khalil IA, Hussain I, Afzal F. 2008. Diversity for morphological and maturity traits in maize populations from upper Dir. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 24(3), 439-443.

Ristic D, Babic V, Anðelkovic V, Vancetovic J, Drinic SM, Dragana I. 2013. Genetic diversity in maize dent landraces assessed by morphological and molecular markers. Genetika, 45(3), 811-824.

Ristic D, Kostadinovic M, Kravic N, Andjelkovic V, Vancetovic J, Ignjatovic-Micic D. 2014. Genetic diversity in maize flint landraces assessed by morphological and SSR markers. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Agriculture and Food 2, 206-213.

Romay MC, Millard MJ, Glaubitz JC, Peiffer JA, Swarts KL, Casstevens TM, Elshire RJ, Acharya CB, Mitchell SE, Flint-Garcia SA, McMullen MD, Holland JB, Buckler ES, Gardner CA. 2013. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biology 14, 1-18.

Saad MS, Rao VR. eds. 2001. Establishment and Management of Field Genebank, a Training Manual. IPGRI-APO, Serdang. Accessed on 26 May 2016 at:

Salami HA, Adjanohoun A, Padonou W, Yacoubou AM, Aly D, Yallou C, Sina H, Baba-Moussa L. 2015. Morphological diversity of corn’s (Zea mays L.) local cultivar and improved varieties in Central and North of Benin. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6, 2867-2877.

Sharma L, Prasanna BM, Ramesh B. 2010. Analysis of phenotypic and microsatellite-based diversity of maize landraces in India, especially from the North East Himalayan region. Genetica 138, 619-631.

Shiri MR, Choukan R, Aliyev RT. 2014. Study of genetic diversity among maize hybrids using SSR markers and morphological traits under two different irrigation conditions. Crop Breeding Journal 4(1), 65-72.

Sood S, Flint-Garcia S, Martha C, Willcox MC, Holland JB. 2014. Mining natural variation for Maize improvement: Selection on phenotypes and genes. Genomics of Plant Genetic Resources P. 615 – 649.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7572-5_25.

Sun R, Lin F, Huang P, Zheng Y. 2016. Moderate genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in the Relict Tree Liquidambar formosana Hance Revealed by genic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1411.

Wangai AW, Redinbaugh MG, Kinyua ZM, Miano DW, Leley PK, Kasina M, Mahuku G, Scheets K, Jeffers D. 2012b. First report of maize chlorotic mottle virus and maize lethal necrosis in Kenya. Plant Disease Journal 96,1582-1583.

Whitt SR, Wilson LM, Tenaillon MI, Gaut BS, Buckler ES. 2002. Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(20), 12959-12962.

Yao Q, Yang K, Pan G, Rong T. 2007. Genetic Diversity of Maize (Zea mays L.) Landraces from Southwest China based on SSR data. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 34(9), 851-860.

Mujuni Sospeter Kabululu, Tileye Feyissa, Patrick Alois Ndakidemi. 2017. Genetic diversity of maize landraces from Tanzania as compared with commercial improved varieties and elite lines through morphological characterization. Int. J. Biosci. 10(3), 309-322.
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update