home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Evaluation of five different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought stress conditions at haripur valley.

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2016
Views (275) Download (5)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of five different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought stress conditions at haripur valley.

Ibrar Khan, Sami Ullah Khan, Khwaja Muhammad Khan, Ayub Khan, Ali Raza Gurmani, Sajid Ali, Shah masaoud khan, Izhar Khan, Irfan Ullah, Israr Ali, Ahmad Ali
Int. J. Biosci.8( 5), 236-241, May 2016.
Certificate: IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]
Key: 100 grain weightDays to maturityDroughtNumber of grainsPlant heightSpike length

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the “Evaluation of five different wheat genotypes under drought stress conditions at Haripur valley”. The five wheat varieties were sown in pots using Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications. The wheat pots were kept in two different arrangements for drought stress and control condition. The control pots plants was kept in the open climate under ordinary conditions. ANOVA revealed highly significant (p≤0.01) differences for the whole parameters in five different wheat genotypes. The data for eight traits were studied viz., days to 50% heading, days to maturity, number of grains per spike, plant height, 100-grain weight, number of spikelet’s spike-1, number of tillers and spike length. Under drought and controlled conditions maximum values of days to 50% heading, days to maturity, plant height, spike length, number of spikelet’s spike-1, number of grains spike-1, number of tillers and 100-grain weight ranged from 71.33 to 74.66, 122.33 to 128.67, 65.73 to 68.26cm, 9.50 to 10.43, 21.26 to 22.33, 41.33 to 51.67, 4.00 to 4.00 and 2.91 to 3.52 g for drought stress and control, respectively. Similarly minimum values were observed for days to 50% heading (69 to 71.66), days to maturity (120.33 to 123.67), plant height (51.00 to55.73), spike length (8.20 to 9.26), number of spikelet’s spike-1 (19.80 to 21.26), number of grains spike-1 (36.00 to 41.33), number of tillers plant-1 (2.00 to 3.00), 100-grain weight (2.50 to 3.24g) for drought stress and control respectively.

VIEWS 3
Cover PDF

Ahmad M, Akram Z, Munir M, Rauf M. 2006. Physio-morphic response of wheat genotypes under rainfed conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38, 1697-1702.

Arzani A. 2002. Grain yield performance of durum wheat germplasm under Iranian dry land and irrigated field conditions. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 34, 9-18.

Ashraf MY. 1986. Yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes grown under soil water deficit condition. Acta. Agronomy. Humg. 46, 45-51.

Baalbaki R, Hassan NH, Zurayk R. 2006. Aegilops species from semiarid areas of Lebanon Variation in quantitative attributes under water stress. Crop Science 46, 799.

Blum A, Shpiler L, Golan G, Meyer J, Sinmena B. 1991. Mass selection of wheat for grain filling without transient photosynthesis. Euphytica 54, 111-116.

Cabeza C, Kin A, Ledent FJ. 1993. Effect of water shortage on main shoot development and tillering of common and spelt wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 170, 243-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439037X.1993.tb01082.x

Camejo D, Jimenez A, Alarcon JJ, Torres W, Gomez JM, Sevilla F. 2006. Changes in photosynthetic parameters and antioxidant activities following heat-shock treatment in tomato plants. Functional Plant Biology 33, 177-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/FP05067

Cone AE, Slafer GA, Halloran GM. 1995. Effects of moisture stress on leaf appearance, tillering and other aspects in Triticum tanschii. Euphytica 86, 55-64.

Dencic S, Kastori R, Kobiljski B, Duggan B. 2000. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions. Euphytica 113, 43-52.

Ehlers  JD,  Hall  AE.  1998.  Heat  tolerance  of contrasting cowpea lines in short and long days. Field Crops Research.55,11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00055-5

Ghodsi M. 2004. Ecophysiological aspects of water deficit on growth and development of wheat cultivars. PhD Thesis, University of Tehran.

Gogorcena Y, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Escuredo PR, Becana M. 1993. Antioxidant defenses against activated oxygen in pea nodules subjected to water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 108, 753-758.

Hossain A, Teixeira da Silva JA, Lozovskaya MV, Zvolinsky VP. 2012. The effect of high temperature stress on the phenology, growth and yield of five wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) genotypes. Asian Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 6, 14–23.

Hurd EA. 1971. Can we breed for drought resistance? In Drought injury and Resistance in Crops. (Larson,K.L.ed) Crop Science of Society 2, 77-88.

Innes P, Blackwell RD, Austin RB, Ford MA. 1981. The effects of selection for number of ears on the yield and water economy of winter wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science 96, 523-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600036844

Iqbal M, Ahmad K, Ahmad I, Sadiq M, Ashraf MY. 1999. Yield and yield components of durum wheat. (triticum durum Desf ) as influenced by water at various growth stages Pakistan Journal Of Biological Sciences 2, 1438-1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.1999.1438.1440

Kalinin NI. 1988. Parameters of spring wheat cultivar in relation to drought type. Nauchno-Isledovatel’ skogo Instituta Rastenievodstva Imeni N.I Vavilova. 177, 15-17.

Kazmi RH, Khan MQ, Abbasi MK. 2003. Effect of water stress on the performance of wheat grown under controlled conditions at Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 19, 61-68.

Kiliç H, Yagbasanlar T. 2010. The effect of drought stress on grain yield, yield components and some quality traits of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) cultivars. Not. Bot. Hort. Agro.bot. Cluj. 38, 164-170.

Laghari KA, Sial MA, Arain MA, Dahot MU, Mangrio MS, Pirzada AJ. 2010. Comparative performance of wheat advance lines for yield and its associated traits. World Applied Sciences Journal 8 (Special Issue of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering): 34-37: ISSN 1818-4952.

Moayedi AA, Boyce AN, Barakbah SS. 2010. The performance of durum and bread wheat genotypes associated with yield and yield component under different water deficit conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4, 106-113.

Mostajeran A, Rahimi-Eichi V. 2009. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars and accumulation of proline and soluble sugars in sheath and blades of their different ages leave. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences 5, 264-272.

Naroui RR, Kadir MA, Ehawa Z, Jaafar Cgement D. 2012.  Physiological  and  biochemical relationship under drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum). African Journal Of Biotechnology 11, 1574-1578. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1109

Ooro PA, Bor PK, Amadi DOK. 2009. Evaluation of wheat genotypes for improved drought tolerance through increased seedling vigour. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 9, 49-53. Record Number = 20133232444.

Peltonen-Sainio P. 1991.Effect of moderate and severe drought stress on the pre-anthesis development and yield formation of Oats. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 63, 379-389. http://aims.fao.org/serials/c_177cfaec

Rosales S, Kohashi-Shibata RJ, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Trejo-Lopez C, Ortiz ereceres J, Kelly JD. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research 85,203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8

Saleem M. 2003. Response of durum and bread wheat genotypes to drought stress: biomass and yield components. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2, 290-293.

Shalaby EM, Rahim HMA, Mosaad MG, Masoud MM. 1988. Effect of watering regime on morpho-physiological traits and harvest index and its components of wheat. Assiut University. Journal of Agriculture sciences 19, 195-207.

Siddiqui KA. 1977. Synthetic amphiploids in breeding-genetic and evolutionary studies in wheat. In: Genetic Diversity in Plants. Eds. A. Muhammad,R.Aksel, R.C. von Borstel. pp. 97-102. Plenum Press, New York.

Siddiqui KA, Arain AG. 1974. Performance and selection for yield of wheat mutants derived from different cultivars. Euphytica 23, 585-590.

Siddiqui KA. 2008. Coping with wheat in Pakistan in the wake of green biotechnology, nano biotechnology and food sovereingnty. 11 th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Brisbane, Australia.: www.iwgs.info) (E:iwgs@fcconventions.com.au).

Zarea FA, Ghodsi M. 2004. Evaluation of yield and yield components of facultative and winter bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) under different irrigation regimes in Khorasam province in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Agronomy 3, 184-187. http://aims.fao.org/serials/c_9ecc0948.

Submit Manuscript