International network for natural sciences – research journal
  • mendeley icon
  • linkedin icon
  • google plus icon
  • twitter icon
  • google scholar icon
  • facebook icon

Effect of seed rate and row spacing on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar ‘Sargodha 2002’

By: Sikander Hayat, Ghulam Nabi, M. Riaz Gondal, Syed Raza Hussain, Saleem Il Yasin, Ahmad Hussain, Syed Rizwan Abbas

Key Words: Zea mays, Seed rate, Row spacing, Grain yield

Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 323-329, January 2018.


Certification: ijb 2018 0215 [Generate Certificate]


The effect of seed rate 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40kg/ha and row spacing 30, 45, and 60cm on agronomic characteristics of plants including plants/m2, plant height, stem diameter, number of cobs/m2, cob/plant, number of grains/cob, 1000 grain weight and grain yield was conducted using the cultivar “Sargodha 2002” for two years from 2015-16 to 2016-2017. Seed rates and row spacing had significant effect on number of cobs/m2, number of cobs /plant number of grain/cob and grain yield/ha. Row spacing had non-significant effect on plant height, stem diameter, plants/m2 and seed rate had non-significant effect on 1000grain weight. During the two years study row spacing (45cm) with seeding (35kg/ha) produced the highest grain yield. Significant effect of seed rate and row spacing on different parameters was recorded. Row spacing at 45cm produced the highest number of cobs/m2, number of cobs/plant and 1000 grain weight. In each row spacing increase in seed rate resulted in increase in plant height. Increase in the seed rate and row spacing resulted in decreased stem diameter. Maximum yield was recorded with 45cm spacing and 35kg/ha seed rate. Row spacing 30 and 60cm and seed rates 20, 25, 30 & 40kg/ha resulted in lower yields.

| Views 17 |

Effect of seed rate and row spacing on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar ‘Sargodha 2002’

Akcin A, Sade B, Tamkoc A, Topal A. 1993 – Effect of different plant densities and nitrogen fertilization rates on the grain yield, yield components and some morphological traits of hybrid TTM813 grown at Kenya. Doga, Turk Turmve orrmanculik Dergisi 17(1), 181-294. [Field Crop Abs 47(6), 3339, 1994].

Andrade FH, Calvino P, Cirilo A, Baebieri P. 2002. Yield responses to narrow row depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal. 94 (10), 113-118.

Bekele S, Boddupalli MP, Hellin J, Bangziger M. 2011. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security Food security 3(3), 307-327.

Bryant HH, Touchto JT, Moore DP. 1986. Narrow row and early planting produce top grain sorghum yields. Highlights Agriculture Research Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station 33(5).

De Bruin JL, Pederson P. 2008. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on soybean yield. Agron. J 100, 204-210.

Doebley JF. 2004. The genetics of maize evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 38, 37-59.

FAO. 2009. Maize, rice and wheat: area harvested, production quantity, yield.

Statistics Division. FAO, Rome.

Fernandez CJ, Fromme DD, Grichar WJ. 2012. Grain sorghum response to row spacing and plant populations in the Texas coastal Bend region. International Journal of Agronomy Article ID 238634, 6 pages.

Fulton JM. 1970. Relationships among soil moisture stress, plant populations, row spacing, and yield of corn. Can. J. Plant Sci 50, 31-38.

Geleta B, Atak M, Baenziger PS, Nelson LA, Baltenesperger DD, Eskridge KM, Shipmam MJ, Shelton DR. 2002. Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end use quality of winter wheat. Crop Sci 42, 827-832.

Habyarimana E, Bonardi P, Laureti D, Di Bari V, Cosentino S, Lorenzoni C. 2004. Multilocational evaluation of biomasssorghum hybrids under two stand densitites and variable water supply in Italy. Ind. Crops Prod 20, 3-9.

Johnson WA, Prostko EP, Mullinix BG. 2005. Improving the management of dicot weeds in peanut with narrow row and residual herbicides. Agronomy Journal 97(1), 85-88.

Kashiwagi T, Togawa E, Hirotsu N, Ishimaru K. 2008. Improvement of lodging resistance with QTLs for stem diameter in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Theor. Appl. Genet 117, 749-757.

Lemerle D, Causens RD, Gill LS, Peltzer SJ, Moerkerk M, Murphy CE, Collins D, Cullis BR. 2004. Reliability of higher seed rates of wheat for increased competitiveness with weeds in low rainfall environment. Journal of Agriculture Science 142, 395-409.

Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Diffy S. 2006. Influence of field pea (Pisum sativum) density on grain yield and competitiveness with annual rye grass (Lolium rigidum) in south-eastern Astralia. Australian Jouranal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1465-1472.

Owino CO. 2009. Decreased row spacing as an option for increasing maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Trans Nzoia district, Kenya. J. plant Breeding Crop sci (8), 281-283.

Pakistan Economic Survey 2016-17. 2017. Economic adviser’s wing, Finance division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Persson T, Garcia A, Paz J, Jones J, Hoogenboom G. 2009. Maize ethanol feedstock production and net energy value as affected by climate variability and crop management practices, Agricultural Systems 100(1-3), 11-21.

Rana JS, Ahuja KN. 1986. Response of mungbean varities to different row spacings. Indian J. Agron 31(3), 308-309.

Schmitt J, Wulff RD. 1993. Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. Trends Ecol. Evol 8, 47-51.

Sharma TR, Adamu IM. 1984 – The effect of plant population on yield and yield contributing characters in maize (Zea mays L.). Zeytschrift-furAcker and Pflanzenbau 153(4), 315- 318 (Field Crop Absts., 38: 3437; 1985).

Snider JL, Raper RL, Schwab EB. 2012. The effect of row spacing and seed rate on biomass production and plant stand characteristics of non-irrigated photoperiod-sensitive sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Industrial Crops and Products 37, 527-535.

Srivastava SN, Namdeo KN, Tripathi AR, Pandey RP. 1980. Effect of row spacings and levels of phosphorus on blackgram (Vigna mungo, var. radiata Hepper). Madras Agri. J. 67(12), 771-773.

Staggenborg SA. 1999. Grain sorghum response to row spacings and seeding rates in Kansas. Journal of Production Agriculture 12(3), 390-395.

Steiner JL. 1986. Dryland grain sorghum water use, light interception and growth response to planting geometry. Agronomy J 78, 720-726.

Stickler FC, Laude HH. 1960. Effect of row spacing and plant population on performance of corn, grain sorghum and forage sorghum. Agron. J 52, 275-277.

Tianu A, Picu I, Tianu M. 1983. Influence of sowing density on some physiological elements in maize yield formation under irrigation. Probleme de Agrofitotehnie Teoretică și Aplicată, București 5(3), 219-230.

Tyagi RC, Singh D, Hooda IS. 1998 – Effect of plant population, irrigation and nitrogen on yield and its attributes of spring maize (Zea mays L.). Indian Agron. J 43(4), 672-676.

Van Der Werf HMG, Wijlhuizen M, de Shutter JAA. 1995. Planting density and self thinning affect yield and quality of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Field Crops Research, 40, 153-164.

Venuto B, Kindiger B. 2008. Forage and biomass feedstock production from hybrid forage sorghum and sorghum sudangrass hybrids. Grassl. Sci 54, 189-196.

Walker RH, Buchanan GA. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Science 30, 17-24.

Wortmann CS, Liska AI, Ferguson RB, Lyon DI, Klein RN, Dweikat I. 2010. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska, Agron. J. 102, 319-326.

Sikander Hayat, Ghulam Nabi, M. Riaz Gondal, Syed Raza Hussain, Saleem Il Yasin, Ahmad Hussain, Syed Rizwan Abbas.
Effect of seed rate and row spacing on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivar ‘Sargodha 2002’.
Int. J. Biosci. 12(1), 323-329, January 2018.
Copyright © 2018
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
innspub logo
english language editing
    Publish Your Article
    Submit Your Article
Email Update